document.write('
\x0a \x0a \x0a (photo by fgirardin on Flickr)
\x0aDuring a recent talk in Switzerland (video) Matt Jones introduced the term “Mujicomp”. He said that ubiquitous computing components need to be “tasteful, simple, clear, clean, contemporary and affordable in order to be invited into the home” and that Mujicomp is a key factor in developing a bottom up strategy to building the sentient city.
\x0aI couldn’t agree more… but it does worry me a little.
\x0aI love the idea and there’s definitely a place in the world - my world even - for Mujicomp but I think we could be in danger of forgetting something.
\x0aTo understand what (I think) he meant by Mujicomp it’s probably worth looking at the design ethos of Jasper Morrison and Naoto Fukosawa. Two designers that introduced the concept of Super Normal in 2007.
\x0a
The zen-like Super Normal philosophy is about design that’s executed in such a way that it’s easy for people to accept because it effectively becomes part of the existing “normal” in their lives. It upgrades normal but doesn’t shout about it in order to pander to the designer’s ego. It simply dissolves into behaviour.
\x0aNaoto Fukosawa’s ”design dissolving into behaviour” quote is used in relation to ubicomp frequently. He also designined the classic Muji CD player so I can see why it’s logical to end up with Muji as the style benchmark for the Internet of Things but I think we’re in danger of forgetting that the majority of people probably think Muji is posh, boring - or even “poncy”.
\x0aI have a feeling that Mujicomp is likely to only get invited into the homes of the people with taste.
\x0aIf we really want to design the sentient city from the bottom up we shouldn’t forget that the rest of the world aren’t designers. We should be thinking about those that probably think Billy Big Mouth Bass is something hilarious, and worthy of display on their wall.
\x0a\x0aThis photo from Matt Jones’ Flickr is titled “Not Mujicomp” and he’s right. It certainly isn’t super normal for me but I think we shouldn’t discount the mileage we could get by creating things with such mass appeal.
\x0aI know the stuff in that photo is only destined to be landfill and would probably do more harm than good but we’re designers - we can work out how to be funny and sustainable at the same time, surely.
\x0aI definitely reckon I’d add funny to the list of attributes needed to get ubicomp invited into people’s homes.
\x0a“Digital interactions are moving beyond keypad and screens and into sensing, networked products that inhabit our everyday lives. This session will explore how designers can create engaging experiences between physical products and digital services.”
\x0aMore great IxDA10 stuff from Timo Arnall (Elasticspace).
\x0aJames Bridle has made a book for the post digital panel at SXSW.
\x0a\x0a\x0a
\x0aIt’s designed to last you the week you’re at SXSW and features maps, a diary, schedule, info pulled from the Lonely Planet guide to Texas and space for you to write notes.
\x0aAccording to James it was:
\x0a“Pulled together in a few hours at the last minute despite planning it for ages. HTML -> XML -> InDesign for the talks schedule. Simple PDF resizing for the LP section. Basic-as layout for the rest, with some running heads and page numbers to minimise endless searching. Printed 10 through Lulu – £5 a pop, plus £25 to expedite shipping (because I left it until the last possible moment). Arrived in 4 working days. Done.”\x0a\x0a
It’s great but I can’t help thinking it could have had more hooks back into the digital domain. I’m not entirely sure what and how but It feels like you should be able to use it as a jumping off point to go and get more content, submit content or communicate with the other owners of the book.
\x0aThere’s more information on Booktwo.org if you’re interested.
\x0a
\x0a \x0a \x0a The guys at Panic have released details of the status board they built for their office. It’s a web page that displays the following information - frequently updated using AJAX.
\x0a\x0a
Something interesting from their blog post.
\x0aLes, one of our support guys, said it best after a week: “That board is like magic.” Our support turnaround time is faster than it’s ever been. Just the simple act of “publicizing” those numbers — not in a cruel way, but a “where are we at as a group?” way — has kept the support process on-task and, I think, made it a bit more like a video game. (It helps that when all the boxes are at “zero”, a virtual bottle of champagne appears on-screen, and a physical one is likely removed from the fridge.)\x0a
Great stuff. Imagine if something like this was to be done at scale on urban screens.
\x0a